Book Review : Leadership Lessons; Avoiding the Pitfalls of King Saul

leadlessThere is certainly no famine of books, resources, and experts that are dedicated to the subject of leadership. Even a cursory examination of the shelves of your local bookstore will reveal volumes dedicated to the science, practice, and styles of leadership. One common theme found in this myriad of leadership advice and counsel is to give the “best practices” of leadership. In other words most leadership material comes from the “in order to succeed you must do this” point of view. There is nothing inherently wrong with this. It is refreshing however to see the matter of leadership approached from the other side. In their new book, “Leadership Lessons; Avoiding the Pitfalls of King Saul”, religion professors Ralph Hawkins and Richard Parrott examine leadership from the “worst practices” perspective.

Hawkins and Parrott write, “One of the unique features of this volume is that, in it, we take a sustained look at the life of a single, individual leader. This approach has a number of benefits. First, rather than arbitrarily selecting five or ten points upon which to pontificate, the selection of a key figure out of history and the examination if his life and leadership to allow the problem behaviors under consideration to emerge naturally. In other words, the ten behaviors examined in this book were not arbitrarily selected nor were they invented by the authors. Instead, they emerged from Saul’s own life story. They are rooted in reality. This means that, while these self-defeating behaviors are, to some extent, Saul’s own character defects, they may also be, to some degree, common or universal problems. A second benefit of tracing the foibles of one leader throughout his lifetime is that we are able to get a long-term perspective of how these problems arise and how they play themselves out if they are not addressed.”

Hawkins and Parrott shine the light on the life of Saul, Israel’s first king and expose the gross leadership failures of the man whom God chose to be the earthly leader of His people. (Reviewer’s note: It should not be concluded that God is to blame for Saul’s failure. It should also not be concluded that God was wrong in His choice of Saul as Israel’s first king. Saul’s failures were his own; the result of his free will.) Although King Saul is credited with some small successes, the authors term his overall reign as a “net-negative”. Hawkins and Parrott list the ten areas where King Saul suffered leadership failure. They term these as pitfalls. They are:

1. Saul Failed to Handle Authority Humbly.

2. Saul Failed to Break Out of His Tendency to Isolate Himself.

3. Saul Failed to Think Before He Spoke.

4. Saul Failed to Act When the Time Was Right.

5. Saul Failed to Lead the People, but Let Them Lead His Instead.

6. Saul Failed to Promote or Make Necessary Changes.

7. Saul Failed to Love the People.

8. Saul Failed to A Be True to His Own Ethics.

9. Saul Failed to Admit Failure or Concede to David.

10. Saul Failed to Consult God.

In each of the sections the authors make their case for Saul as a failed leader. Using the biblical account of Saul’s reign, Hawkins and Parrott demonstrate, through Saul’s actions, words, and attitudes that he is an example of who not to follow. Included in each of these ten pitfalls are modern-day examples of the same leadership style and failure. The authors provide solid examples of both secular and spiritual leaders who failed in the same manner as Saul. Action steps are included in each of the ten sections that help the reader to avoid making the same mistakes Saul did. Finally, each pitfall contains a section for group discussion and personal evaluation. Leadership Lessons is a fantastic book. In places it is brutally honest. In others it offers much needed encouragement. Still in others it passionately calls all leaders to understand the weight of their assignments. I feel strongly that this book should be required reading by everyone who holds a leadership position; most especially ministry leaders. It is that good. The term “must read” is over-used and is often inaccurately applied to many books today. However, this is one of them. In the beginning the authors asked the question, “Why study a failed leader?” They quote leadership expert Denis Waitley as their answer. He writes, “King Saul resides within each of us, and this marvelous book provides a magic mirror reflecting the essence of how to turn failure into the fertilizer of success.”

Disclosure of Material Connection: I received this book free from Thomas Nelson Publishers as part of their Blogger Review Program. I was not required to write a positive review. The opinions I have expressed are my own. I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR, Part 255: “Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising.”

What Happens When Leaders Abuse Their People?

Every organization has a leader. Every organization, whether secular or spiritual, has an individual who gives guidance, sets vision and tempo, and looks out for the best interests of their people. I believe there are two main types of leadership: given and assumed. Given leadership means that an individual was is hired to lead. In this sense, power and authority to lead are given. Assumed leadership means that in the absence of a clear leader, or in light of a poor leader, steps forward to lead out of concern for the well-being of the organization.

With leadership comes entrusted authority. With leadership comes entrusted power. With leadership comes grave responsibility. The leader of any organization must resist the temptation to allow the authority and power entrusted to them to corrupt. They must constantly guard against what British historian Lord Acton believed when he said, “power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” From time to time, a strange thing occurs when an individual is given an opportunity to lead. Instead of respecting the organization and the people of that organization, they begin to abuse their people and hold that entrusted power over the heads of the people. Why would a leader allow themselves to become an abuser? I would say pride, arrogance, and self-promotion lead to such narcissistic behavior. This is tragic. What happens when leaders abuse their people?

1. When leaders abuse their people, credibility is weakened.

John Maxwell once said, “People buy into the leader before they buy into the vision.” Leaders must give the people a reason to follow. The organization has to see a reason to give their loyalty and trust to their leader. Credibility is built when leaders demonstrate, through word and deed that the people of the organization matter most. However, when leaders worry more about themselves and push personal agendas, the organization doesn’t have reason to trust and follow. Abusive leaders never get the “buy in”.

2. When leaders abuse their people, participation is discouraged.

A common trait with leaders who abuse their people is that they would rather “be right” than “do right”. When a leader wants to have the last word, have everything done their way, and criticize and belittle any opinions not their own, people within the organization begin to feel unappreciated and unwanted. If the abuse goes on long enough, those within the organization stop trying and stop participating and ask themselves, “why bother?” When any leader demands the final word and operates under the “my way or the highway” rule, they are silently saying, “you are not needed, nor wanted”. At this point, the only cure is a different leader.

Book Review : I’ve Got Your Back

ivegotI am certain that all of have experienced some kind of “bad” leadership in our lives. Perhaps it was an elected official who displayed questionable behavior ethically. Perhaps it was an employer who was more concerned with profits and results than the well-being of their employees. Perhaps your “bad” leadership happened in a church setting as a pastor/ministry leader abused their position for self-gain. In his new book “I’ve Got Your Back; a Leadership Parable – biblical Principles for Leading and Following Well”, strategy consultant James Galvin takes on the matter of leadership in a unique and interesting way. Galvin believes that if Jesus were to write a book dealing with leadership today, He would communicate this message in story form.

Galvin’s book is in parable form which takes up the first two-thirds of the book. He chronicles the fictional journey of four college friends learning how to deal with various leadership problems at work and within the church. As these four gather together for Bible study, they realize they need guidance in the area of leadership. They are referred to a mentor who is a retired missionary for help. Through a series of weekly meetings, Jack (the mentor) gives the group assignments to work through while introducing them to good leadership principles. It is in this section that the reader is introduced to an aspect of leadership that is often overlooked and deserving of attention. Galvin describes this aspect as “followership”. He says, “the essence of leadership is helping people follow well.” Galvin says there are our kinds of leadership abusers and four ways to respond to them. The abusers are incompetent, disempowering, manipulative, and toxic. These are the issues that the mentees are dealing with in their own lives. Jack helps them to work through their difficulty by giving the four responses to “bad” leadership. The options are avoid leadership roles, perpetuate the cycle of abuse, hide behind servant leadership, and develop your unique potential. The reader here is introduced to the three types of follower scenarios: Type 1 (following God), Type 2 (following inherited leaders – family and government), and Type 3 (following human beings with or without organizational authority).

The last third of the book is a “Concise Theology of Leadership and Followership”. It is here that Galvin outlines the principles that are woven throughout the parable. Galvin uses extensive amounts of scripture to show the reader how following well in biblical. I enjoyed this book. I appreciate the emphasis on being a good follower as an integral part of leadership. “I’ve Got Your Back” reminds me a great deal of Patrick Lencioni’s “Death by Meeting”. A very practical and challenging work.

Disclosure of Material Connection: I received this book free from Handlebar Publishers as part of their Blogger Review Program. I was not required to write a positive review. The opinions I have expressed are my own. I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR, Part 255: “Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising.”

Book Review : Next Generation Leader

leaderLeadership. Those who have been given charge over others often struggle with the nuts and bolts of it. Questions swirl around this subject in the areas of leadership principles, characteristics of successful leaders, and indicators of dysfunctional leadership. The mere mention of leadership brings to mind certain authors who have written extensively on leadership. Men such as Al Mohler, John Maxwell, and Stephen Covey are powerful and influential voices today in this arena. However, another voice has emerged in the circles of leadership. Andy Stanley, pastor of Northpoint Community Church in Atlanta, GA has written a book entitled, “Next Generation Leader; Five Essentials for Those Who Will Shape the Future”. Stanley has emerged as a leadership voice to a younger generation. From his leadership podcasts to Catalyst Conferences, he provides leadership principles in a fresh and exciting light. He writes, “My passion is to help equip you to become a leader whose life is marked by qualities that ensure a no-regrets experience for those who choose to follow; a leader who leaves this world in better shape than he found it.”

Stanley divides his book into five sections. In each of these sections, he zeroes in on the important traits and qualifications that he believes makes an effective leader. The five sections are: competence, courage, clarity, coaching, and character. In the first section, competence, Stanley states that leaders must focus their energy toward the areas of leadership they have the greatest capacity to succeed in. He stresses the importance of maximizing you strengths and delegating your weaknesses. In the second section, courage, he shares that a leader is not always the smartest one in the office. Leaders possess courage to initiate action and move ahead. In the third section, clarity, Stanley shares that the leader cannot be vague, instead, he/she must clear, even if uncertain. He writes, “Uncertainty will not be your undoing as a leader. However, your inability to give a clear directive in the midst of uncertainty might very well be the thing that takes you out or causes you to plateau in your career”. In the fourth section, coaching, he emphasizes that regardless of how good or talented you are, everyone needs coaching to take us to the next level. In the fifth section, character, Stanley talks about the importance of “moral accountability” and how the personal life of a leader determines their followship.

Stanley has written a good book. It is not a difficult read, only 158 pages. The strengths of the book are his personal experiences and transparency. He allows the reader to learn from his past mistakes. He also utilizes scripture in a way that is especially insightful. As with all of his books, Stanley’s writing style is engaging, easy-to-follow, and profoundly simplistic. As far as weaknesses go, from a church leader’s stand point, it is a bit narrow and did not expand upon leadership challenged unique to church leadership. Overall, a great work. I recommend it to all who have been given the privilege to lead others.

Disclosure of Material Connection: I received this book free from Waterbrook Multnomah Publishers as part of their Blogger Review Program. I was not required to write a positive review. The opinions I have expressed are my own. I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR, Part 255: “Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising.”

Leadership Lessons from Nehemiah : Lesson #10

This post completes the 10 part series on Leadership Lessons from the book Nehemiah.

Leaders do not argue with their opponents.

Proponents and opponents: those for and against something. Every leader has both in the circle of influence. Nehemiah was no different. He had received word of the condition of Jerusalem’s walls and his heart was broken. He had prayed, sensing a God-given mission, and approached the king for assistance. He made the long trip to Jerusalem, surveyed the situation first-hand, and gave a reasonable and attainable goal to the people. When Sanballat and Tobiah approached Nehemiah, sounding like children on the playground, a choice had to be made. Does he move forward with his plans or does he come down off the wall and argue with them about the legitimacy of his work? Does he make wise use of his time and strength by carrying out the work or does he waste time, energy, and strength arguing whether it could or could not be accomplished? Nehemiah chose in that pivotal and critical moment to not argue. As the work continued and his opponent’s displeasure became louder, he later made his decision known, loud and clear. He said, “So I sent messengers to them, saying, “I am doing a great work, so that I cannot come down. Why should the work cease while I leave it and go down to you?” [Nehemiah 6:3]

There is a difference between casting and defending a vision before those you lead and arguing with them about the legitimacy of that vision. There is a difference between answering legitimate questions from the organization and arguing with them about it. The difference : the opponent’s spirit. Nehemiah opponents were not genuinely concerned with his vision. They were not there to understand better the work at hand. They were not there to investigate how they might be involved. Instead, their spirit was one that simply wanted to see the work stopped and the Israelites embarrassed. Period. Leaders must decide where they will spend their precious time, strength, and energy. Will they spend it helping their opponents who genuinely want to better understand their vision and decision? Or, will they spend it arguing with an opponent who only wishes to see the work stop or fail? Nehemiah answers this question for us. Leaders lead confidently and choose not to argue, instead, inform and encourage. Ed Stetzer sums this matter up perfectly. He said, “You do not have to show up to every argument you are invited to.

Leadership Lessons from Nehemiah : Lesson #9

Leaders display self-confidence when facing opposition.

 As Nehemiah begins his work on rebuilding the walls of Jerusalem, there was opposition to the work. This opposition came in the form of two individuals who belonged to a people who had been enemies of Israel for generations. As these two stood by snickering and laughing at Nehemiah’s people, he confidently reminds them, “The God of heaven Himself will prosper us; therefore we His servants will arise and build, but you have no heritage or right or memorial in Jerusalem.” Nehemiah knew deep down in his heart that the commission he had been given by God was not up for vote. He knew that committee approval was not needed. He knew, as the late Dr. Adrian Rogers had said, “You never lead by caravan”. His self-confidence in the face of opposition was the direct result of his confidence in God.

Leaders today, whether in spiritual or secular circles, must understand that opposition is eventual. That being true, what matters then is how the leader deals with it. Nehemiah confidently stood and declared He was following the plan God had laid out for him. No doubt. A leader must display a high level of self-confidence. If not, all of his/her decisions will be questioned, whether by those who don’t agree, and even the leader himself. People within an organization will appreciate and respect a leader who displays confidence in a decision made. For them, there is a sense of confidence and ease when their leadership confidently hold to their convictions, regardless of opposition.

Leadership Lessons from Nehemiah : Lesson #8

Leaders are not discouraged by opposition.

God gives leaders burdens and visions for what He would have them to do. The leaders in turn communicate to the people how the burden and vision are to be carried out in the form of clear goals. Detractors will be there to argue, disapprove, and challenge the burden, vision, and goal. Nehemiah watched this scenario play itself out before his very eyes. Just as soon as he and the people began to build, Sanballat and Tobiah, enemies of the people of Israel, came on the scene ridicule and make fun of the Israelites with the hope of discouraging them. In the face of their laughter, Nehemiah stands firm and, in essence says that “You have no voice here, God has given this task to us and He will reward us. Leave us alone”.

Leaders today will always face a certain amount of opposition. It is not possible to lead an organization that has people with different opinions, desires, tastes, and expectations and expect everyone to be happy with the direction of that organization. This is true whether the organization is secular or spiritual. Leaders must be clear on the mission that God has given them and lead appropriately. It is certainty of the God-given mission that enables the leader to handle the opposition that comes their way.

Book Review : The Conviction to Lead; 25 Principles For Leadership That Matter

convictionWe are not at a loss for books on the subject of leadership today. It seems that that books are published daily on this subject offering some new insight into this age-old institution. What has been missing from the others has been found in Dr. Al Mohler’s new book, “The Conviction to Lead; 25 Principles for Leadership That Matter.” Dr. Mohler, president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, KY writes with heart, honesty, insight, experience, and conviction that is both refreshing and challenging. From the beginning he says, “Let me warn you right up front – my goal is to change the way you think about leadership. I do not aim to merely add one more voice to the conversation; I want to fundamentally change the way leadership is understood and practiced.” As a Southern Baptist pastor, I am familiar with Dr. Mohler’s engaging style of writing. Having read behind him before, I he would offer a much-needed voice in the arena of leadership principle and practice. He did not disappoint.

As he begins the book, Dr. Mohler sets up a contrast of leaders. Calling on his years of experience, he sees most leaders falling into two specific categories; Believers and Leaders. The Believers seek knowledge and are ready to defend what they believe. They often define themselves in terms of what they believe. On the other hand, they lack the skills and abilities to manage and lead an organization effectively. The Leaders are passionate about and consumed with leadership. They know they language, have read all the books, and attended all the seminars. They are eager to see things changed for the better. On the other hand, at their core being, they do not know what they believe fundamentally. As a result, they are easily swayed. Again, Dr. Mohler writes, “My goal is to knock the blocks out from under the current models of leadership and forge a new way. I stake my life on the priority of right beliefs and convictions, and at the same time I want to lead so that those very beliefs are perpetuated in others. If our leaders are not passionately driven by the right beliefs, we are headed for disaster. At the same time, if believers cannot lead, we are headed nowhere.”

From there, Dr. Mohler covers a wide array of topics. In his treatment of leadership, he is sure to cover issues that all leaders face today. Each chapter is relatively short and easy to move through. However, that does mean the chapters are light and void of content. Just the opposite. Dr. Mohler communicates a great deal of information very simply while sufficiently challenging the reader. He envisions leaders as communicators, managers, speakers, stewards, writers, readers, thinkers, and teachers. I personally found many of these chapters to be meaningful and challenging. Chapter Fourteen, Leaders are Managers, was especially helpful to me as a pastor. This chapter enabled me to better see how these are two separate and distinct roles requiring certain skills to be successful at both.

Dr. Mohler has written an excellent book. His heart and passion burst through. “The Conviction to Lead” is not a book you will read once and discard. Instead, it will become one of “those” books that you read over and over. I really enjoyed the fact that this book was not written from a sterile, academic, laboratory setting. Instead, Dr. Mohler writes from the trenches and shares battle-tested principles that have obviously first resonated with him and are now for our benefit. Certainly a book that will remain in the circles of leadership discussion for years to come. Go get this book.

Disclosure of Material Connection: I received this book free from Bethany House Publishers as part of their Blogger Review Program. I was not required to write a positive review. The opinions I have expressed are my own. I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR, Part 255: “Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising.”

Leadership Lessons from Nehemiah : Lesson #7

Leaders set before their people clear goals.

“Then I said to them, “You see the distress that we are in, how Jerusalem lies waste, and its gates are burned with fire. Come and let us build the wall of Jerusalem, that we may no longer be a reproach.” (2:17) Once Nehemiah completed his physical tour of the burned city walls of Jerusalem, he fully understood the weight and gravity of the situation. He also clearly knew what had to be done. When his God-given burden to rebuild met his passion God’s city, the conditions were right for him to reveal a clear, concise, and purposeful goal. He said, “let us rebuild the wall of Jerusalem.” He did not say “let’s fix a gate and we’ll look at the rest later.” Instead, he set before the people a clear goal: rebuild. The people now knew what was expected of them. The would be able to measure progress and success. They would be able to see the end in sight. This goal also had a clear purpose, “that we may no longer be a reproach.” This ensured “buy-in” on the part of the people.

Leaders understand the importance of goal-setting. In the same way that Nehemiah placed a clear goal before his people, leaders today should always keep a goal before his/her people. These goals should be clear, not ambiguous. They should be simple, not complicated. They should be attainable, not far-fetched. Goals, where thoughtfully placed before an organization can motivate, improve productivity, and increase loyalty and commitment. The opposite is also true. If there is no organizational goal-setting, the people are left to themselves to figure out the markers for vision, success, and growth.

Leadership Lessons from Nehemiah : Lesson #6

Leaders investigate situations firsthand.

Upon arrival in Jerusalem, Nehemiah took three days to rest, plan, and to pray. One of the first activities afterwards was to survey the walls of Jerusalem for himself. “So I came to Jerusalem and was there three days.  Then I arose in the night, I and a few men with me; I told no one what my God had put in my heart to do at Jerusalem; nor was there any animal with me, except the one on which I rode.  And I went out by night through the Valley Gate to the Serpent Well and the Refuse Gate, and viewed the walls of Jerusalem which were broken down and its gates which were burned with fire.  Then I went on to the Fountain Gate and to the King’s Pool, but there was no room for the animal under me to pass.  So I went up in the night by the valley, and viewed the wall; then I turned back and entered by the Valley Gate, and so returned.” (2:11-15) He had heard the report on the condition of Jerusalem’s walls from a distance. It was this report that broke his heart and created within him a burden to act. In the middle of the night, he arose and began his own physical survey of the destruction. This “fact finding mission” was necessary for two reasons. First, seeing the damage with his own eyes would solidify Nehemiah’s resolve and fuel his passion to rebuild the walls of the city he so dearly loved. Second, seeing the damage with his own eyes allowed Nehemiah to calculate costs, manpower, and time needed to see the project through.

Regardless of the situation, whether it be related to personnel, finances, construction, etc., leaders have a responsibility to investigate to the point they have a comfortable and working knowledge of all matters at hand. This enables the leader, whether spiritual or secular, to remain connected to the organization he/she leads and make the appropriate decisions. This does not mean that leaders have to step in and fix everything for themselves. This is counterproductive. Dr. Al Mohler, in his new book, 25 Principles for Leadership That Matters, sums up this point succinctly. He writes,

Organizations change fast as the world changes around us. The effective leader deploys others within the organization to become specialists in the wide array of knowledge necessary to the total work. But that same leader has to make sure that he can at least hold an intelligent, helpful conversation with each of those leaders and managers about their work. The best leaders take this as an intellectual and organizational challenge that they grow to relish and appreciate. After all, our task is to deploy people so that each can do his or her job. In order to do this, we need to know what that job is, and that takes time and attention.